领先一步
VMware 提供培训和认证,助您加速进步。
了解更多这篇博文是系列文章中的第二篇,旨在深入探讨Reactor更高级的概念和内部工作原理。
它源于我的 Flight of the Flux 演讲,我发现其内容更适合博文格式。
我将在其他文章发布时更新下表中的链接,但这是计划中的内容
如果您错过了 Reactive Streams 和 Reactor 的基本概念介绍,请访问网站的学习部分和参考指南。
话不多说,让我们开始吧
从命令式、阻塞式范式切换到反应式、非阻塞式范式会带来好处,但也会带来一些问题。其中之一就是调试体验。这是为什么呢?
主要是因为您已经习惯了依赖老式的 堆栈跟踪,但突然之间,由于反应式编程的异步特性,这个宝贵的工具变得不那么有价值了。但这并非反应式编程所特有:一旦引入异步代码,您就会在程序中创建一个边界,将调度代码和异步执行代码分隔开来。
我们以 ExecutorService 和 Future 为例(这里没有 Reactor 代码)
private static void imperative() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
final ScheduledExecutorService executor =
Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
List<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = IntStream.range(1, 11).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = IntStream.range(0, 4).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
}
else {
source = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4);
}
executor.submit(() -> source.get(5)) //line 76
.get();
}
这个例子有点做作,但假设我们代码中有三分之二的路径会导致异步任务抛出 IndexOutOfBoundsException... 堆栈跟踪会有多大帮助呢?
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 5 out of bounds for length 4
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:191)
at Scratch.imperative(Scratch.java:77)
at Scratch.main(Scratch.java:50)
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 5 out of bounds for length 4
at java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.get(Arrays.java:4351)
at Scratch.lambda$imperative$0(Scratch.java:76)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
我们看到
Future 的 get() 方法抛出了 ExecutionExceptionIndexOutOfBoundsExceptionsubmit(() -> source.get(5)) lambda 的第 76 行FutureTask 中执行,来自一个名为 ThreadPoolExecutor 的东西,它本身在 Thread 中运行...submit() 之前采用了哪条路径)。用处不大 :-(
如果我们寻找上面代码的 Reactor 等效项,我们可以得到以下代码
private static void reactive() {
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
Mono<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(1, 10)
.elementAt(5);
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(0, 4)
.elementAt(5);
}
else {
source = Flux.just(1, 2, 3, 4)
.elementAt(5);
}
source.subscribeOn(Schedulers.parallel())
.block(); //line 97
}
这将触发以下堆栈跟踪
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onComplete(MonoElementAt.java:153)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.fastPath(FluxArray.java:176)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.request(FluxArray.java:96)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.request(MonoElementAt.java:92)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoSubscribeOn$SubscribeOnSubscriber.trySchedule(MonoSubscribeOn.java:186)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoSubscribeOn$SubscribeOnSubscriber.onSubscribe(MonoSubscribeOn.java:131)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onSubscribe(MonoElementAt.java:107)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:53)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt.subscribe(MonoElementAt.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:3711)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoSubscribeOn$SubscribeOnSubscriber.run(MonoSubscribeOn.java:123)
at reactor.core.scheduler.WorkerTask.call(WorkerTask.java:84)
at reactor.core.scheduler.WorkerTask.call(WorkerTask.java:37)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
Suppressed: java.lang.Exception: #block terminated with an error
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.blockingGet(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:93)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1495)
at Scratch.reactive(Scratch.java:97)
at Scratch.main(Scratch.java:51)
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException,这暗示源对于 MonoElementAt 运算符来说太短了onComplete,本身由 request 触发...以及 reactor.core.publisher 中的一堆其他步骤range (FluxRange.subscribe)、elementAt 和 subscribeOn 组成...ThreadPoolExecutor 的工作 Thread 执行的更糟糕的是,即使我们去掉了 subscribeOn,我们仍然无法发现是哪条可能的错误路径被触发了
private static void reactiveNoSubscribeOn() {
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
Mono<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(1, 10)
.elementAt(5);
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(0, 4)
.elementAt(5);
}
else {
source = Flux.just(1, 2, 3, 4)
.elementAt(5);
}
source.block(); //line 116
}
给出堆栈跟踪
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onComplete(MonoElementAt.java:153)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.fastPath(FluxArray.java:176)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.request(FluxArray.java:96)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.request(MonoElementAt.java:92)
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.onSubscribe(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:49)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onSubscribe(MonoElementAt.java:107)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:53)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt.subscribe(MonoElementAt.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1494)
at Scratch.reactiveNoSubscribeOn(Scratch.java:116)
at Scratch.main(Scratch.java:52)
Suppressed: java.lang.Exception: #block terminated with an error
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.blockingGet(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:93)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1495)
... 2 more
这是因为,正如我们之前看到的,在组装和订阅之间存在一个额外的“边界”。线索只能追溯到订阅点(这里是 block()):-(
因此,在异步世界中,使用堆栈跟踪进行分析和调试变得更加困难,在 Reactor 中甚至更困难(因为它既是异步的,又采用默认的懒惰组装与订阅方法)。但幸运的是,库中提供了工具来缓解这一事实。
log还记得你在命令式代码中散布 print 语句吗?它可能不如启动单步调试器酷炫,但有时它就是你需要的快速而粗暴的解决方案。
在 Reactor 中,您有 log() 操作符
onNext、onComplete、onError(甚至包括 onSubscribe、cancel 和 request!)Logger简而言之,log 是一个快速而粗糙的解决方案,可以轻松地鸟瞰序列中某个步骤的发生情况。在开发过程中尽情使用它,并可以为每个 log 调用指定一个“名称”以区分它们。
使用 log(String) 可以用来暗示哪个源导致了错误
private static void log() {
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
Mono<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(1, 10)
.elementAt(5)
.log("source A");
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(0, 4)
.elementAt(5)
.log("source B");
}
else {
source = Flux.just(1, 2, 3, 4)
.elementAt(5)
.log("source C");
}
source.block(); //line 138
}
堆栈跟踪本身并没有更有趣(除了提到 MonoLogFuseable 类,但日志本身包含这个有趣的小细节)
17:01:23.711 [main] INFO source C - | onSubscribe([Fuseable] MonoElementAt.ElementAtSubscriber)
17:01:23.716 [main] INFO source C - | request(unbounded)
17:01:23.717 [main] ERROR source C - | onError(java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException)
17:01:23.721 [main] ERROR source C -
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: null
至少我们得到了我们硬编码的 source C 标签...
Reactor 中可用的另一种方法是尝试在运行时堆栈跟踪中找回组装信息。
这可以通过 Hooks 类激活所谓的“调试模式”来完成
Hooks.onOperatorDebug();
它有什么作用?它使每个运算符实例化(即组装)都捕获一个堆栈跟踪并保留它以供以后使用。
如果 onError 到达某个运算符,它会将该组装堆栈跟踪附加到 onError 的 Throwable 上(作为抑制的 Exception)。因此,当您看到堆栈跟踪时,您将获得更完整的运行时和组装信息。
在调试模式开启的情况下,在我们之前的示例中,我们将能够看到采用了哪个组装路径以及实际处理了哪个源
private static void hook() {
Hooks.onOperatorDebug();
try {
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
Mono<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(1, 10)
.elementAt(5); //line 149
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(0, 4)
.elementAt(5); //line 153
}
else {
source = Flux.just(1, 2, 3, 4)
.elementAt(5); //line 157
}
source.block(); //line 160
}
finally {
Hooks.resetOnOperatorDebug();
}
}
这会产生以下堆栈跟踪
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onComplete(MonoElementAt.java:153)
(...)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1494)
at Scratch.hook(Scratch.java:160)
at Scratch.main(Scratch.java:54)
Suppressed: reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblyException:
Assembly trace from producer [reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt] :
reactor.core.publisher.Flux.elementAt(Flux.java:4367)
Scratch.hook(Scratch.java:157)
Error has been observed by the following operator(s):
|_ Flux.elementAt ⇢ Scratch.hook(Scratch.java:157)
注意最后一行了吗?太棒了 :-D
checkpoint 降低成本使用 Hooks.onOperatorDebug() 的一个缺点是,它会为应用程序中使用的每个运算符捕获组装堆栈跟踪。填充单个堆栈跟踪是一个昂贵的操作,因此不言而喻,这可能会对性能产生重大影响。因此,这仅建议在开发环境中使用。
幸运的是,如果您识别出代码库中容易出现那种源模糊不清的部分,您可以稍微降低成本。
通过使用 checkpoint() 操作符,可以仅在该代码库的特定点激活组装跟踪捕获。如果您使用 checkpoint(String) 为检查点提供一个唯一且有意义的名称,甚至可以完全不填充堆栈跟踪
private static void checkpoint() {
int seconds = LocalTime.now().getSecond();
Mono<Integer> source;
if (seconds % 2 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(1, 10)
.elementAt(5)
.checkpoint("source range(1,10)");
}
else if (seconds % 3 == 0) {
source = Flux.range(0, 4)
.elementAt(5)
.checkpoint("source range(0,4)");
}
else {
source = Flux.just(1, 2, 3, 4)
.elementAt(5)
.checkpoint("source just(1,2,3,4)");
}
source.block(); //line 186
}
这将产生以下堆栈跟踪
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onComplete(MonoElementAt.java:153)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.fastPath(FluxArray.java:176)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray$ArraySubscription.request(FluxArray.java:96)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.request(MonoElementAt.java:92)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblySubscriber.request(FluxOnAssembly.java:438)
at reactor.core.publisher.BlockingSingleSubscriber.onSubscribe(BlockingSingleSubscriber.java:49)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblySubscriber.onSubscribe(FluxOnAssembly.java:422)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt$ElementAtSubscriber.onSubscribe(MonoElementAt.java:107)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:53)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxArray.subscribe(FluxArray.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt.subscribe(MonoElementAt.java:59)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoOnAssembly.subscribe(MonoOnAssembly.java:61)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.block(Mono.java:1494)
at Scratch.checkpoint(Scratch.java:186)
at Scratch.main(Scratch.java:55)
Suppressed: reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnAssembly$OnAssemblyException:
Assembly site of producer [reactor.core.publisher.MonoElementAt] is identified by light checkpoint [source just(1,2,3,4)].
注意到最后一行了吗?is identified by light checkpoint [source just(1,2,3,4)].,这告诉我们罪魁祸首(因为我们为检查点使用了有意义的描述)。
在本文中,我们了解到在异步编程中,堆栈跟踪可能不那么有用。这种影响因 Reactor 允许您以惰性方式构建反应式序列而进一步加剧。
我们研究了可能遇到的最坏情况以及减轻此问题的几种方法。
完整的代码可以在 这里 的 gist 中找到。
在下一篇中,我们将学习调度器以及如何在不同线程之间切换。
与此同时,祝您反应式编程愉快!